-->

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

The Impact of Financial Aid Association Involvement




 
I have had the privilege of representing SASFAA and VASFAA on four Capitol Hill visits over the past three years.  Hill visits are a great opportunity for members of our state associations and SASFAA to meet with members of Congress and their staffs to advocate on behalf of our students and fellow financial aid professionals.  One of the topics we have presented as part of the Hill visits in which I have participated is institutional ability to limit Direct Loan amounts.  We learned at the 2016 NASFAA Annual Conference that this idea is gaining traction in Congress as part of the impending reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.  Moreover, limiting loan amounts is not a new idea as ED has an existing experimental site initiative to test limiting unsubsidized loan amounts.

As a community college financial aid administrator, I have been in favor of institutional ability to limit Direct Loan amounts.  Viewing limiting loans from a purely institutional perspective, I see having this ability as a positive both for students by helping them keep from amassing student loan debt and for institutions that recognize that certain programs or enrollment levels may not require full loan amounts for enrollment and completion purposes.  I still think limiting loan amounts makes senses from the institutional perspective, but after attending a couple of sessions at the 2016 NASFAA Annual Conference and reading current research regarding student loans and college access and success, I am not so sure that limiting loan amounts makes sense for students.
In many cases, limiting loan amounts may make the difference for a student choosing to purchase or not to purchase textbooks and supplies, being able to cut back on hours at work to devote more hours to classes and study, being able to afford the extra child care a parent might need while in school, covering unexpected expenses that crop up over the course of a semester, etc.  The list goes on and on, and each of these examples may have a negative impact on a student’s success and ultimate goal of completion.
At this point, I am undecided about where I stand on this important issue.  So, why bring it up?  I bring it up because to me it illustrates the importance of what our associations do.  We have a voice in Washington, DC, and members of Congress and their staffs listen to us and value what we have to say.  Further, our associations bring us together so that we may share ideas and opinions.  Nowhere is this more evident than at our annual state, regional, and national conferences and workshops.  As we share ideas and listen to each other when we come together for conferences and workshops, we learn new things and hear different perspectives.  Participation in our state, regional, and national associations helps us grow professionally. 
Submitted by: Chad Sartini
                       VASFAA President
Coordinator of Financial Aid, Veterans’ Affairs, and Records
 

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Good post Chad. It is a tricky situation, however, as it is with most things when dealing with the feds, the local folks or in this case the schools themselves know their students far better than the bureaucrats in DC. So, with that in mind, it certainly makes sense to me to let the schools do what we do best, which is meet our students' needs on an individual basis. For me it makes little difference because I am at a higher cost private school and out students need their full loan amount, but in the grand scheme of things, I can see how just having the flexibility to do so for lower cost schools could make a big difference.

Lane Smith
Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama

Karen Hauser said...

Good perspective, Chad. Thanks for the "food for thought".

Karen Hauser
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN