LEGISLATIVE RELATIONS
COMMITTEE
Protect Students from Poor-Performing
Career College Programs
Obama Administration Announces Final Rules to Protect Students from Poor-Performing Career College Programs
New
regulations put tough standards in place for career training programs to help
protect students from being saddled with debt they cannot repay
To protect students at career colleges from becoming burdened by student loan debt they cannot repay, today the U.S. Department of Education is announcing regulations to ensure that these institutions improve their outcomes for students—or risk losing access to federal student aid. These regulations will hold career training programs accountable for putting their students on the path to success, and they complement action across the Administration to protect consumers and prevent and investigate fraud, waste and abuse, particularly at for-profit colleges.
"Career colleges must be a stepping stone to the middle class. But too
many hard-working students find themselves buried in debt with little to show
for it. That is simply unacceptable," U.S. Secretary of Education Arne
Duncan said. "These regulations are a necessary step to ensure that
colleges accepting federal funds protect students, cut costs and improve
outcomes. We will continue to take action as needed."
To qualify for federal student aid, the law requires that most for-profit
programs and certificate programs at private non-profit and public institutions
prepare students for "gainful employment in a recognized occupation."
Under the regulations finalized today, a program would be considered to lead to
gainful employment if the estimated annual loan payment of a typical graduate
does not exceed 20 percent of his or her discretionary income or 8 percent of
his or her total earnings. Programs that exceed these levels would be at risk
of losing their ability to participate in taxpayer-funded federal student aid
programs.
The final gainful employment regulations follow an extensive rulemaking
process involving public hearings, negotiations and about 95,000 public
comments. The regulations, which will go into effect on July 1, 2015, reflect
the feedback the Department received, and aim to protect Americans from poor
career training programs by targeting those programs that leave students buried
in debt with few opportunities to repay it. Highlights of the rule include:
Preventing students from being buried in debt: Based on available data, the
Department estimates that about 1,400 programs serving 840,000 students—of whom
99 percent are at for-profit institutions—would not pass the accountability
standards. All programs will have the opportunity to make immediate changes
that could help them avoid sanctions, but if these programs do not improve,
they will ultimately become ineligible for federal student aid—which often
makes up nearly 90 percent of the revenue at for-profit institutions.
More rigorous accountability than previous regulations: The new regulations are
tougher than the Department's 2011 rules because they set a higher passing
requirement and lay out a shorter path to ineligibility for the
poorest-performing programs. In 2012, the Department estimated that 193
programs would not have passed the previous regulations; with respect to these
new regulations, based on available data, the Department estimates that about
1,400 programs would not pass the accountability metric.
Providing transparency about student success: The rule also provides useful
information for all students and consumers by requiring institutions to provide
important information about their programs, like what their former students are
earning, their success at graduating, and the amount of debt they accumulated.
Improving student outcomes: The regulations build on momentum toward increased
accountability in higher education by setting standards for career training
programs, including programs offered by for-profit institutions, to ensure they
are serving students well. While the Department has seen encouraging changes in
the past five years, it believes all career training programs can and should
meet higher expectations.
The Department also will lead an effort to formalize an interagency task
force to help ensure proper oversight of for-profit institutions of higher
education. In particular, the Department and other federal and state agencies
will coordinate their activities and promote information sharing to protect
students from unfair, deceptive, and abusive policies and practices. The task
force will build on efforts already underway among various federal agencies,
and include the Departments of Justice, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, as well
as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Trade Commission, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and other agencies moving forward. In
addition, state attorneys general will also be invited to continue their
participation in this collaboration. Given the important responsibilities each
of these federal agencies has, and the vital role that states play, the
agencies will leverage their resources and expertise to assist one another,
thereby making the best use of scarce resources and better protecting the
interests of students and taxpayers. This task force will formalize and
strengthen a working group that has been working together over the past year
and that has coordinated efforts in several reviews and investigatory work. The
task force will meet as needed, but at least once each quarter.
Background on the Administration's efforts to protect students from
poor-performing career colleges
Too often, students at career colleges—including thousands of veterans—are charged excessive costs, but don't get the education they paid for. Instead, students in such programs are provided with poor quality training, often for low-wage jobs or in occupations where there are simply no job opportunities. They find themselves with large amounts of debt and, too often, end up in default. In many cases, students are drawn into these programs with confusing or misleading information.
Too often, students at career colleges—including thousands of veterans—are charged excessive costs, but don't get the education they paid for. Instead, students in such programs are provided with poor quality training, often for low-wage jobs or in occupations where there are simply no job opportunities. They find themselves with large amounts of debt and, too often, end up in default. In many cases, students are drawn into these programs with confusing or misleading information.
The situation for students at for-profit institutions is particularly
troubling. On average, attending a two-year for-profit institution costs a
student four times as much as attending a community college. More than 80
percent of students at for-profits borrow, while less than half of students at
public institutions do. Ultimately, students at for-profit colleges represent
only about 11 percent of the total higher education population but 44 percent
of all federal student loan defaults.
In response to these concerns, in 2009, the Department began extensive
conversations with the higher education community about the role of career
colleges, particularly on how they could be held accountable for the outcomes
of their students. Following a 2012 court decision, which affirmed the U.S.
Department of Education's authority to regulate in this area in order to
protect students and taxpayers, the Department undertook new efforts to make
sure career training programs provide affordable pathways to good jobs.
The Department believes many institutions have already started to take
steps to improve. Some of the largest institutions have instituted trial
periods for programs before students have to commit, so students can decide if
that program is right for them. There are reports that institutions have
decreased program lengths. Some are reducing costs. And a few institutions have
closed some locations and programs they judge to be performing poorly.
More information about today's announcement, including a copy of the final
regulations, can be found on the Department's website:
Submitted by: Sharon Oliver, Legislative Relations Chair
No comments:
Post a Comment